9.5. Classful Queueing DisciplinesClassful qdiscs are very useful if you have different kinds of traffic which should have differing treatment. One of the classful qdiscs is called 'CBQ' , 'Class Based Queueing' and it is so widely mentioned that people identify queueing with classes solely with CBQ, but this is not the case. CBQ is merely the oldest kid on the block - and also the most complex one. It may not always do what you want. This may come as something of a shock to many who fell for the 'sendmail effect', which teaches us that any complex technology which doesn't come with documentation must be the best available. More about CBQ and its alternatives shortly. 9.5.1. Flow within classful qdiscs & classesWhen traffic enters a classful qdisc, it needs to be sent to any of the classes within - it needs to be 'classified'. To determine what to do with a packet, the so called 'filters' are consulted. It is important to know that the filters are called from within a qdisc, and not the other way around! The filters attached to that qdisc then return with a decision, and the qdisc uses this to enqueue the packet into one of the classes. Each subclass may try other filters to see if further instructions apply. If not, the class enqueues the packet to the qdisc it contains. Besides containing other qdiscs, most classful qdiscs also perform shaping. This is useful to perform both packet scheduling (with SFQ, for example) and rate control. You need this in cases where you have a high speed interface (for example, ethernet) to a slower device (a cable modem). If you were only to run SFQ, nothing would happen, as packets enter & leave your router without delay: the output interface is far faster than your actual link speed. There is no queue to schedule then. 9.5.2. The qdisc family: roots, handles, siblings and parentsEach interface has one egress 'root qdisc', by default the earlier mentioned classless pfifo_fast queueing discipline. Each qdisc can be assigned a handle, which can be used by later configuration statements to refer to that qdisc. Besides an egress qdisc, an interface may also have an ingress, which polices traffic coming in. The handles of these qdiscs consist of two parts, a major number and a minor number. It is habitual to name the root qdisc '1:', which is equal to '1:0'. The minor number of a qdisc is always 0. Classes need to have the same major number as their parent. 9.5.2.1. How filters are used to classify trafficRecapping, a typical hierarchy might look like this:
But don't let this tree fool you! You should *not* imagine the kernel to be at the apex of the tree and the network below, that is just not the case. Packets get enqueued and dequeued at the root qdisc, which is the only thing the kernel talks to. A packet might get classified in a chain like this: 1: -> 1:1 -> 12: -> 12:2 The packet now resides in a queue in a qdisc attached to class 12:2. In this example, a filter was attached to each 'node' in the tree, each choosing a branch to take next. This can make sense. However, this is also possible: 1: -> 12:2 In this case, a filter attached to the root decided to send the packet directly to 12:2. 9.5.2.2. How packets are dequeued to the hardwareWhen the kernel decides that it needs to extract packets to send to the interface, the root qdisc 1: gets a dequeue request, which is passed to 1:1, which is in turn passed to 10:, 11: and 12:, which each query their siblings, and try to dequeue() from them. In this case, the kernel needs to walk the entire tree, because only 12:2 contains a packet. In short, nested classes ONLY talk to their parent qdiscs, never to an interface. Only the root qdisc gets dequeued by the kernel! The upshot of this is that classes never get dequeued faster than their parents allow. And this is exactly what we want: this way we can have SFQ in an inner class, which doesn't do any shaping, only scheduling, and have a shaping outer qdisc, which does the shaping. 9.5.3. The PRIO qdiscThe PRIO qdisc doesn't actually shape, it only subdivides traffic based on how you configured your filters. You can consider the PRIO qdisc a kind of pfifo_fast on steroids, whereby each band is a separate class instead of a simple FIFO. When a packet is enqueued to the PRIO qdisc, a class is chosen based on the filter commands you gave. By default, three classes are created. These classes by default contain pure FIFO qdiscs with no internal structure, but you can replace these by any qdisc you have available. Whenever a packet needs to be dequeued, class :1 is tried first. Higher classes are only used if lower bands all did not give up a packet. This qdisc is very useful in case you want to prioritize certain kinds of traffic without using only TOS-flags but using all the power of the tc filters. It can also contain more all qdiscs, whereas pfifo_fast is limited to simple fifo qdiscs. Because it doesn't actually shape, the same warning as for SFQ holds: either use it only if your physical link is really full or wrap it inside a classful qdisc that does shape. The last holds for almost all cable modems and DSL devices. In formal words, the PRIO qdisc is a Work-Conserving scheduler. 9.5.3.1. PRIO parameters & usageThe following parameters are recognized by tc:
Reiterating, band 0 goes to minor number 1! Band 1 to minor number 2, etc. 9.5.3.2. Sample configurationWe will create this tree:
Bulk traffic will go to 30:, interactive traffic to 20: or 10:. Command lines:
Now let's see what we created:
We now do some bulk data transfer with a tool that properly sets TOS flags, and take another look:
It worked - all additional traffic has gone to 10:, which is our highest priority qdisc. No traffic was sent to the lowest priority, which previously received our entire scp. 9.5.4. The famous CBQ qdiscAs said before, CBQ is the most complex qdisc available, the most hyped, the least understood, and probably the trickiest one to get right. This is not because the authors are evil or incompetent, far from it, it's just that the CBQ algorithm isn't all that precise and doesn't really match the way Linux works. Besides being classful, CBQ is also a shaper and it is in that aspect that it really doesn't work very well. It should work like this. If you try to shape a 10mbit/s connection to 1mbit/s, the link should be idle 90% of the time. If it isn't, we need to throttle so that it IS idle 90% of the time. This is pretty hard to measure, so CBQ instead derives the idle time from the number of microseconds that elapse between requests from the hardware layer for more data. Combined, this can be used to approximate how full or empty the link is. This is rather circumspect and doesn't always arrive at proper results. For example, what if the actual link speed of an interface that is not really able to transmit the full 100mbit/s of data, perhaps because of a badly implemented driver? A PCMCIA network card will also never achieve 100mbit/s because of the way the bus is designed - again, how do we calculate the idle time? It gets even worse if we consider not-quite-real network devices like PPP over Ethernet or PPTP over TCP/IP. The effective bandwidth in that case is probably determined by the efficiency of pipes to userspace - which is huge. People who have done measurements discover that CBQ is not always very accurate and sometimes completely misses the mark. In many circumstances however it works well. With the documentation provided here, you should be able to configure it to work well in most cases. 9.5.4.1. CBQ shaping in detailAs said before, CBQ works by making sure that the link is idle just long enough to bring down the real bandwidth to the configured rate. To do so, it calculates the time that should pass between average packets. During operations, the effective idletime is measured using an exponential weighted moving average (EWMA), which considers recent packets to be exponentially more important than past ones. The UNIX loadaverage is calculated in the same way. The calculated idle time is subtracted from the EWMA measured one, the resulting number is called 'avgidle'. A perfectly loaded link has an avgidle of zero: packets arrive exactly once every calculated interval. An overloaded link has a negative avgidle and if it gets too negative, CBQ shuts down for a while and is then 'overlimit'. Conversely, an idle link might amass a huge avgidle, which would then allow infinite bandwidths after a few hours of silence. To prevent this, avgidle is capped at maxidle. If overlimit, in theory, the CBQ could throttle itself for exactly the amount of time that was calculated to pass between packets, and then pass one packet, and throttle again. But see the 'minburst' parameter below. These are parameters you can specify in order to configure shaping:
Internally, CBQ has a lot of fine tuning. For example, classes which are known not to have data enqueued to them aren't queried. Overlimit classes are penalized by lowering their effective priority. All very smart & complicated. 9.5.4.2. CBQ classful behaviourBesides shaping, using the aforementioned idletime approximations, CBQ also acts like the PRIO queue in the sense that classes can have differing priorities and that lower priority numbers will be polled before the higher priority ones. Each time a packet is requested by the hardware layer to be sent out to the network, a weighted round robin process ('WRR') starts, beginning with the lower priority classes. These are then grouped and queried if they have data available. If so, it is returned. After a class has been allowed to dequeue a number of bytes, the next class within that priority is tried. The following parameters control the WRR process:
Please note that all classes within an CBQ hierarchy need to share the same major number! 9.5.4.3. CBQ parameters that determine link sharing & borrowingBesides purely limiting certain kinds of traffic, it is also possible to specify which classes can borrow capacity from other classes or, conversely, lend out bandwidth.
Within such an agency class, there might be other classes which are allowed to swap bandwidth. 9.5.4.4. Sample configurationThis configuration limits webserver traffic to 5mbit and SMTP traffic to 3 mbit. Together, they may not get more than 6mbit. We have a 100mbit NIC and the classes may borrow bandwidth from each other.
As said before, CBQ requires a *lot* of knobs. All parameters are explained above, however. The corresponding HTB configuration is lots simpler.
These are our two classes. Note how we scale the weight with the configured rate. Both classes are not bounded, but they are connected to class 1:1 which is bounded. So the sum of bandwith of the 2 classes will never be more than 6mbit. The classids need to be within the same major number as the parent CBQ, by the way!
Both classes have a FIFO qdisc by default. But we replaced these with an SFQ queue so each flow of data is treated equally.
These commands, attached directly to the root, send traffic to the right qdiscs. Note that we use 'tc class add' to CREATE classes within a qdisc, but that we use 'tc qdisc add' to actually add qdiscs to these classes. You may wonder what happens to traffic that is not classified by any of the two rules. It appears that in this case, data will then be processed within 1:0, and be unlimited. If SMTP+web together try to exceed the set limit of 6mbit/s, bandwidth will be divided according to the weight parameter, giving 5/8 of traffic to the webserver and 3/8 to the mail server. With this configuration you can also say that webserver traffic will always get at minimum 5/8 * 6 mbit = 3.75 mbit. 9.5.4.5. Other CBQ parameters: split & defmapAs said before, a classful qdisc needs to call filters to determine which class a packet will be enqueued to. Besides calling the filter, CBQ offers other options, defmap & split. This is pretty complicated to understand, and it is not vital. But as this is the only known place where defmap & split are properly explained, I'm doing my best. As you will often want to filter on the Type of Service field only, a special syntax is provided. Whenever the CBQ needs to figure out where a packet needs to be enqueued, it checks if this node is a 'split node'. If so, one of the sub-qdiscs has indicated that it wishes to receive all packets with a certain configured priority, as might be derived from the TOS field, or socket options set by applications. The packets' priority bits are or-ed with the defmap field to see if a match exists. In other words, this is a short-hand way of creating a very fast filter, which only matches certain priorities. A defmap of ff (hex) will match everything, a map of 0 nothing. A sample configuration may help make things clearer:
Defmap refers to TC_PRIO bits, which are defined as follows:
The TC_PRIO.. number corresponds to bits, counted from the right. See the pfifo_fast section for more details how TOS bits are converted to priorities. Now the interactive and the bulk classes:
The 'split qdisc' is 1:0, which is where the choice will be made. C0 is binary for 11000000, 3F for 00111111, so these two together will match everything. The first class matches bits 7 & 6, and thus corresponds to 'interactive' and 'control' traffic. The second class matches the rest. Node 1:0 now has a table like this:
For additional fun, you can also pass a 'change mask', which indicates exactly which priorities you wish to change. You only need to use this if you are running 'tc class change'. For example, to add best effort traffic to 1:2, we could run this:
The priority map over at 1:0 now looks like this:
FIXME: did not test 'tc class change', only looked at the source. 9.5.5. Hierarchical Token BucketMartin Devera (<devik>) rightly realised that CBQ is complex and does not seem optimized for many typical situations. His Hierarchical approach is well suited for setups where you have a fixed amount of bandwidth which you want to divide for different purposes, giving each purpose a guaranteed bandwidth, with the possibility of specifying how much bandwidth can be borrowed. HTB works just like CBQ but does not resort to idle time calculations to shape. Instead, it is a classful Token Bucket Filter - hence the name. It has only a few parameters, which are well documented on his site. As your HTB configuration gets more complex, your configuration scales well. With CBQ it is already complex even in simple cases! HTB is not yet a part of the standard kernel, but it should soon be! If you are in a position to patch your kernel, by all means consider HTB. 9.5.5.1. Sample configurationFunctionally almost identical to the CBQ sample configuration above:
The author then recommends SFQ for beneath these classes:
Add the filters which direct traffic to the right classes:
HTB certainly looks wonderful - if 10: and 20: both have their guaranteed bandwidth, and more is left to divide, they borrow in a 5:3 ratio, just as you would expect. Unclassified traffic gets routed to 30:, which has little bandwidth of its own but can borrow everything that is left over. Because we chose SFQ internally, we get fairness thrown in for free! Linux HOWTO full list |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This document, LDP HOWTO-INDEX, is copyrighted (c) 1995 - 2002 by Tim Bynum, Guylhem Aznar, Joshua Drake and Greg Ferguson. Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.1 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, with no Front-Cover Texts, and with no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is available at http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html. If you have questions, please contact the LDP.
Web Design Copyright © 1999-2003. Chrisranjana Software Solutions Pvt Ltd. syndicate rss feed |